- remove PASSWORD_SCHEME altogether
- introduce CREDENTIAL_ROUNDS
- migrate all old hashes to the current format
- auto-detect/enable all hash types that passlib supports
- upgrade passlib to 1.7.4 (see #1706: ldap_salted_sha512 support)
1777: Add mergify to the list of trusted authors r=Diman0 a=nextgens
The idea is to prevent backports from being stuck pending review for too long.
#1767 was created by a trusted author (p0) ... reviewed and merged to master relatively quickly... but it's backport got stuck for a week (#1768) as it required double the number of reviews.
This probably needs to be backported to be effective
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
1765: Set sensible cookie flags on the admin app r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
Bugfix
## What does this PR do?
It sets the right flags on the session cookie issued by the admin app.
This should probably be backported as the lack of secure flag on TLS-enabled setup is a high risk vulnerability.
SameSite is hardening / helps against CSRF on modern browsers
HTTPOnly is hardening / helps reduce the impact of XSS
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
1691: update webmails to PHP 7.4 r=mergify[bot] a=lub
## What type of PR?
update
## What does this PR do?
### Related issue(s)
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [ ] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [ ] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
I think it's a minor change, which needs no changelog.
I've tested rainloop, would be great if someone could test roundcube, because I don't use it.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1763: show flash messages again r=mergify[bot] a=lub
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
This basically restores the behaviour, that got removed in
ecdf0c25b3 during refactoring.
### Related issue(s)
- noticed it while reviewing #1756
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [-] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [-] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1711: fix typo in faq.rst r=Diman0 a=tomwojcik
1712: Add details for postfix-overrides r=mergify[bot] a=sholl
## What type of PR?
Documentation clarification
## What does this PR do?
### Related issue(s)
this clarifies the FAQ about overrides and fixes#1628
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Wójcik <tomwojcik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephan Holl <stephan@holl-land.de>
Co-authored-by: Stephan Holl <1610827+sholl@users.noreply.github.com>
1618: add OCSP stapling to nginx.conf r=mergify[bot] a=lub
It's not added in tls.conf, because apparently the mail ssl module
doesnt' support OCSP stapling.
https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_ssl_module.html#ssl_stapling
^ exists
https://nginx.org/en/docs/mail/ngx_mail_ssl_module.html#ssl_stapling
^ missing
When the configured certificate doesn't have OCSP information, it'll
just log a warning during startup.
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
It enables OCSP stapling for the http server. OCSP stapling reduces roundtrips for the client and reduces load on OCSP responders.
### Related issue(s)
- fixes #1616
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1607: _FILE variables for Docker swarm secrets r=mergify[bot] a=lub
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
This PR enables usage of DB_PW_FILE and SECRET_KEY_FILE instead of DB_PW and SECRET_KEY to load these values from files instead of supplying them directly. That way it's possible to use Docker secrets.
### Related issue(s)
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1767: Remove "CHUNKING" capability from nginx-smtp r=mergify[bot] a=Nebukadneza
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
With `CHUNKING`set as a capability, nginx advertises this capability to
clients at a stage where the SMTP dialog does not seem to be forwarded
to the proxy-target (postfix) yet. Nginx' SMTP parser itself does not
support the `BDAT` command issued as part of a chunke-d dialog. This makes
Nginx respond with a `250 2.0.0 OK` and close the connection, after the
mail-data got sent by the client — without forwarding this to the
proxy-target.
With this, users mail can be lost.
Furthermore, when a user uses a sieve filter to forward mail, dovecot
sometimes chunks the forwarded mail when sending it through `front`.
These forwards then fail.
Removing `CHUNKING` from the capabilities fixes this behavior.
### Related issue(s)
closes#1766
Co-authored-by: Dario Ernst <dario@kanojo.de>
With `CHUNKING`set as a capability, nginx advertises this capability to
clients at a stage where the SMTP dialog does not seem to be forwarded
to the proxy-target (postfix) yet. Nginx' SMTP parser itself does not
support the `BDAT` command issued as part of a chunke-d dialog. This makes
Nginx respond with a `250 2.0.0 OK` and close the connection, after the
mail-data got sent by the client — without forwarding this to the
proxy-target.
With this, users mail can be lost.
Furthermore, when a user uses a sieve filter to forward mail, dovecot
sometimes chunks the forwarded mail when sending it through `front`.
These forwards then fail.
Removing `CHUNKING` from the capabilities fixes this behavior.
Florent Daigniere