- remove PASSWORD_SCHEME altogether
- introduce CREDENTIAL_ROUNDS
- migrate all old hashes to the current format
- auto-detect/enable all hash types that passlib supports
- upgrade passlib to 1.7.4 (see #1706: ldap_salted_sha512 support)
1765: Set sensible cookie flags on the admin app r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
Bugfix
## What does this PR do?
It sets the right flags on the session cookie issued by the admin app.
This should probably be backported as the lack of secure flag on TLS-enabled setup is a high risk vulnerability.
SameSite is hardening / helps against CSRF on modern browsers
HTTPOnly is hardening / helps reduce the impact of XSS
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
1763: show flash messages again r=mergify[bot] a=lub
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
This basically restores the behaviour, that got removed in
ecdf0c25b3 during refactoring.
### Related issue(s)
- noticed it while reviewing #1756
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [-] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [-] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1618: add OCSP stapling to nginx.conf r=mergify[bot] a=lub
It's not added in tls.conf, because apparently the mail ssl module
doesnt' support OCSP stapling.
https://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_ssl_module.html#ssl_stapling
^ exists
https://nginx.org/en/docs/mail/ngx_mail_ssl_module.html#ssl_stapling
^ missing
When the configured certificate doesn't have OCSP information, it'll
just log a warning during startup.
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
It enables OCSP stapling for the http server. OCSP stapling reduces roundtrips for the client and reduces load on OCSP responders.
### Related issue(s)
- fixes #1616
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
1607: _FILE variables for Docker swarm secrets r=mergify[bot] a=lub
## What type of PR?
enhancement
## What does this PR do?
This PR enables usage of DB_PW_FILE and SECRET_KEY_FILE instead of DB_PW and SECRET_KEY to load these values from files instead of supplying them directly. That way it's possible to use Docker secrets.
### Related issue(s)
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [x] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: lub <git@lubiland.de>
With `CHUNKING`set as a capability, nginx advertises this capability to
clients at a stage where the SMTP dialog does not seem to be forwarded
to the proxy-target (postfix) yet. Nginx' SMTP parser itself does not
support the `BDAT` command issued as part of a chunke-d dialog. This makes
Nginx respond with a `250 2.0.0 OK` and close the connection, after the
mail-data got sent by the client — without forwarding this to the
proxy-target.
With this, users mail can be lost.
Furthermore, when a user uses a sieve filter to forward mail, dovecot
sometimes chunks the forwarded mail when sending it through `front`.
These forwards then fail.
Removing `CHUNKING` from the capabilities fixes this behavior.
1654: Ensure that the rendered file ends with newline in order to make `pos… r=mergify[bot] a=tremlin
## What type of PR?
Bugfix
## What does this PR do?
This fixes#1580
### Related issue(s)
- closes#1580
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Rehn <thomas.rehn@initos.com>