1971: Updated Polish translation. r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
translation
## What does this PR do?
Update polish translation. Used `pl/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po` from PR #1751 created by `@martys71`
Part of Discussion of 1.9 roadmap #1930
### Related issue(s)
closes#1751
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [X] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [X] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
1975: Replace traceback with error message when creating initial admin user r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
small enhancement
## What does this PR do?
when creating the admin user via cli a traceback is shown when this user is already present in the database.
This is confusing users. I've replaced the traceback with an error message.
### Related issue(s)
#1921
## Prerequisites
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [X] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [X] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
1968: optimize handle_authentication r=mergify[bot] a=ghostwheel42
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
catch utf-8 decoding errors and log a warning in handle_authentication instead of writing a traceback into the log.
### Related issue(s)
closes#1361
## Prerequistes
Before we can consider review and merge, please make sure the following list is done and checked.
If an entry in not applicable, you can check it or remove it from the list.
- [X] In case of feature or enhancement: documentation updated accordingly
- [X] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/workflow.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Graf <ghostwheel42@users.noreply.github.com>
1967: fix 1789: ensure that nginx resolves ipv4 addresses r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
This fixes ipv6 enabled setup by disabling it. If you were using SUBNET6 in your configuration, odds are it's broken since gunicorn isn't bound on an on an ipv6 enabled socket.
Should we backport this?
### Related issue(s)
- close#1789
- close#1802
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>
1800: AdminLTE 3 r=mergify[bot] a=DjVinnii
## What type of PR?
Enhancement
## What does this PR do?
This PR implements AdminLTE 3 for the admin interface. It also includes the implementation of DataTables and a language selector.
### Related issue(s)
- closes: #1567
- closes: #1764
## Prerequistes
- [x] Unless it's docs or a minor change: add [changelog](https://mailu.io/master/contributors/guide.html#changelog) entry file.
Co-authored-by: Vincent Kling <vincentkling@msn.com>
Co-authored-by: DjVinnii <vincentkling@msn.com>
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Huisman <52963853+Diman0@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Diman0 <diman@huisman.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Huisman <diman@huisman.xyz>
This will default to True and defer emails that fail even "loose"
validation of DANE or MTA-STS
It should work most of the time but if it doesn't and you would rather
see your emails delivered, you can turn it off.
1873: Completed Hebrew translation r=mergify[bot] a=yarons
The Hebrew translation is incomplete so I've completed it.
Co-authored-by: Yaron Shahrabani <sh.yaron@gmail.com>
1939: Ensure that we don't do multiple DNS lookups in the sieve script r=mergify[bot] a=nextgens
## What type of PR?
bug-fix
## What does this PR do?
It ensures that DNS lookups don't introduce inconsistent state. We may want to go further and actually check the return codes of rspamc too.
I haven't tested it but it should work.
### Related issue(s)
- #1938
Co-authored-by: Florent Daigniere <nextgens@freenetproject.org>